78 research outputs found

    Almost-rainbow edge-colorings of some small subgraphs

    Full text link
    Let f(n,p,q)f(n,p,q) be the minimum number of colors necessary to color the edges of KnK_n so that every KpK_p is at least qq-colored. We improve current bounds on the {7/4}n-3,slightlyimprovingtheboundofAxenovich.WemakesmallimprovementsonboundsofErdo˝sandGyaˊrfaˊsbyshowing, slightly improving the bound of Axenovich. We make small improvements on bounds of Erd\H os and Gy\'arf\'as by showing {5/6}n+1\leq f(n,4,5)andforalleven and for all even n\not\equiv 1 \pmod 3,, f(n,4,5)\leq n-1.Foracompletebipartitegraph . For a complete bipartite graph G=K_{n,n},weshowanncolorconstructiontocolortheedgesof, we show an n-color construction to color the edges of Gsothatevery so that every C_4\subseteq G$ is colored by at least three colors. This improves the best known upper bound of M. Axenovich, Z. F\"uredi, and D. Mubayi.Comment: 13 page

    Lobsters with an almost perfect matching are graceful

    Full text link
    Let TT be a lobster with a matching that covers all but one vertex. We show that in this case, TT is graceful.Comment: 4 page

    On a Vizing-type integer domination conjecture

    Get PDF
    Given a simple graph GG, a dominating set in GG is a set of vertices SS such that every vertex not in SS has a neighbor in SS. Denote the domination number, which is the size of any minimum dominating set of GG, by γ(G)\gamma(G). For any integer k1k\ge 1, a function f:V(G){0,1,...,k}f : V (G) \rightarrow \{0, 1, . . ., k\} is called a \emph{{k}\{k\}-dominating function} if the sum of its function values over any closed neighborhood is at least kk. The weight of a {k}\{k\}-dominating function is the sum of its values over all the vertices. The {k}\{k\}-domination number of GG, γ{k}(G)\gamma_{\{k\}}(G), is defined to be the minimum weight taken over all {k}\{k\}-domination functions. Bre\v{s}ar, Henning, and Klav\v{z}ar (On integer domination in graphs and Vizing-like problems. \emph{Taiwanese J. Math.} {10(5)} (2006) pp. 1317--1328) asked whether there exists an integer k2k\ge 2 so that γ{k}(GH)γ(G)γ(H)\gamma_{\{k\}}(G\square H)\ge \gamma(G)\gamma(H). In this note we use the Roman {2}\{2\}-domination number, γR2\gamma_{R2} of Chellali, Haynes, Hedetniemi, and McRae, (Roman {2}\{2\}-domination. \emph{Discrete Applied Mathematics} {204} (2016) pp. 22-28.) to prove that if GG is a claw-free graph and HH is an arbitrary graph, then γ{2}(GH)γR2(GH)γ(G)γ(H)\gamma_{\{2\}}(G\square H)\ge \gamma_{R2}(G\square H)\ge \gamma(G)\gamma(H), which also implies the conjecture for all k2k\ge 2.Comment: 8 page

    All trees are six-cordial

    Full text link
    For any integer k>0k>0, a tree TT is kk-cordial if there exists a labeling of the vertices of TT by Zk\mathbb{Z}_k, inducing a labeling on the edges with edge-weights found by summing the labels on vertices incident to a given edge modulo kk so that each label appears on at most one more vertex than any other and each edge-weight appears on at most one more edge than any other. We prove that all trees are six-cordial by an adjustment of the test proposed by Hovey (1991) to show all trees are kk-cordial.Comment: 16 pages, 12 figure
    corecore